District managers must prepare a five-year silviculture plan for areas where the Crown is required to prepare a silviculture prescription (SP), backlog silviculture prescription (backlog SP) or stand management prescription (SMP).
Major licence holders must prepare and obtain district manager approval for a five-year silviculture plan for areas where the holder is required to prepare a silviculture prescription, backlog silviculture prescription or stand management prescription.
Five-year silviculture plans expire one year from the date the plans take effect.
Five-year silviculture plans for the Small Business Forest Enterprise Program are developed for the entire district or timber supply area (TSA). Licence holders should prepare five-year silviculture plans for their respective operating areas or, an administrative area mutually agreed to by the district manager and the licensee.
The five-year silviculture plan must be signed and sealed by a registered professional forester. If the plan is for the holder of a major licence, it must include the signature of the holder or a person who has authority to sign the plan on behalf of the holder.
The Operational Planning Regulation (the regulation) specifies detailed scope and content requirements for five-year silviculture plans. The treatment schedules must contain silviculture activities that will be undertaken in each of the five years of the plan on areas subject to a silviculture prescription, backlog silviculture prescription or stand management prescription as required under the Act.
The plan must include maps that show the location of the silviculture treatments proposed to be undertaken in the first two years of the plan.
The plan must also contain a schedule of fuel management measures that will be undertaken in each of the first two years of the plan. Fuel management measures are detailed in the Fire Management Guidebook.
If approved silviculture prescriptions or stand management prescriptions are available, it is recommended that they be appended to the plan. If this is not feasible, the public or other resource agencies should be notified of their existence and provided with a place and times where they can be reviewed.
The schedules are to contain the following minimum information:
The scale and level of detail required on the maps will depend on the complexity of management planned for the area. In most cases, the same scale as in the forest development plan will be appropriate (see the Forest Development Plans Guidebook for more information).
All maps must comply with the Ministry of Forests� Cartographic Standards and Data Standards for Silviculture Planning. Maps may be on paper or mylar. Maps on mylar may be designed for overlay onto other maps of the same scale, to aid the joint review of different operational plans (e.g., development plans).
Wherever possible, the same base maps should be used for development plans and five-year silviculture plans. Additional visual aids, such as satellite imagery or aerial photography, are recommended.
As a minimum, the five-year silviculture plan map is to include the following:
The regulation specifies the requirements for public notification, time periods for public review and comment, and inclusion of public review documentation at the time of plan approval. A district manager may not approve or put into effect a five-year silviculture plan that has not met this requirement.
The district manager may extend the review period or may set dates during which the plan is to be advertised, to ensure that specific interested parties have an opportunity for review and comment. For a licensee plan, the district manager is to document the justification for extending the review period and to provide a copy to the affected licensee.
For a licensee plan, the licensee is responsible for referring the plan to the appropriate resource agencies. For further information on the referral process, the licensee should consult the Memorandum of Understanding for Interagency Referrals. The licensee is responsible for consulting with aboriginal peoples where the activities in the plan are to be carried out in areas that affect aboriginal rights (e.g., sustenance, cultural, social and religious activities). It is also the licensee�s responsibility to coordinate the referral and public notification processes with other licensed resource users.
Though not required by legislation, the review process will be more effective if the yearly update of the five-year silviculture plans is presented in conjunction with the forest development plans, for both the major licensees and the Crown. In this way, a more complete representation of proposed forest management activities for a specific area can be presented to the public. It also will be advantageous to make the five-year silviculture plan available to the public annually at the same time of year. This will allow licensees, ministry staff, resource agencies and individuals or interest groups to adequately prepare for the review process.
The district manager may request, in writing, that the plan be referred directly to specific interested parties, other agencies and licensed users of the area under the plan, based on their history of interest and comments, or on written agreements with the district regarding plan notification.
The district manager, or someone designated by the district manager, may approve an amendment to a five-year silviculture plan where the amendment has not been made available for public review. This can occur when the district manager determines that the amendment: